Update crux-toolkit to 4.2 #51986
Update crux-toolkit to 4.2 #51986
Conversation
…recipes into crux-toolkit-4.2
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request involves an update to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 yamllintrecipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token (syntax) 🔇 Additional comments (6)recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml (6)
🧰 Tools🪛 yamllint[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token (syntax)
The build configuration looks good:
Let's verify the maintainers' GitHub accounts and their association with the project.
Let's ensure the source URLs are accessible and checksums match the downloaded files.
Let's ensure the version string format hasn't changed in 4.2 to prevent false test failures. ✅ Verification successfulTest command is appropriate for version verification The test command 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version string format in previous releases
# Search for any version-related changes in release notes or documentation
rg -A 5 "version.*string|output.*format" docs/
rg -A 5 "version.*string|output.*format" README*
Length of output: 147 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try to check the actual version output format directly from the source code
# or any test files that might validate the version output
# Search for version-related code or tests
rg -i "version" --type cpp -A 5
Length of output: 31 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Since we can't find source files directly, let's check what files are available
fd -t f
# Also check if there's any build or test configuration that might contain version info
rg -i "version" -g "*.{yaml,yml,json,xml,txt}"
Length of output: 106297 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the recipe file itself to see if there are any version-specific test commands
cat recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml
Length of output: 1181 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml (1)
22-24: Enhance version test to verify specific version.Consider updating the test to verify the exact version number:
test: commands: - - crux version 2> /dev/null | grep -q 'Crux version' + - crux version 2> /dev/null | grep -q 'Crux version {{ version }}'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/crux-toolkit/meta.yaml (5)
1-5: LGTM: Version update looks correct.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
26-31: LGTM: Package metadata is complete and accurate.
33-39: LGTM: Extra configuration is properly updated with maintainers.
17-21:
Verify the impact of switching from compiler to stdlib.
The change from compiler to stdlib requirements is significant. This suggests the package now relies on system libraries instead of conda-built ones. Please verify:
- This change aligns with the package's build requirements
- It won't introduce compatibility issues across different systems
Consider keeping the compiler requirements if the package needs to be built from source:
requirements:
build:
- - {{ stdlib('c') }}
- - {{ stdlib('cxx') }}
+ - {{ compiler('c') }}
+ - {{ compiler('cxx') }}7-11: Verify source URLs accessibility.
Let's ensure the source URLs are accessible and the SHA256 checksums match.
✅ Verification successful
Source URLs are accessible and valid
Both Linux and OSX download URLs return HTTP 200 OK responses, confirming they are accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify source URLs accessibility and checksums
# Test Linux URL
echo "Checking Linux URL..."
curl -sI "https://noble.gs.washington.edu/crux-downloads/crux-4.2/crux-4.2.Linux.x86_64.zip" | head -n 1
# Test OSX URL
echo "Checking OSX URL..."
curl -sI "https://noble.gs.washington.edu/crux-downloads/crux-4.2/crux-4.2.Darwin.x86_64.zip" | head -n 1
Length of output: 345
…recipes into crux-toolkit-4.2
…recipes into crux-toolkit-4.2
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
Co-authored-by: Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
Update crux-toolkit to 4.2
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.